Inside the head of a designer


Co-design isn’t really that new

Co-Design: Stanley King

I’ve been wanting to blog about this for a good couple of months, a diamond find in my library at the Glasgow School of Art.  The book Co-design: A process of Design Participation discusses the early work of Stanley King and the Co-design group providing an in depth and concise description to the work of community architects and the workshops they facilitated from the 1970s.

The book is so concise in it’s description it provides task by task instructions to organising, facilitating and disseminating workshops, I think this is a must read for designers who undertake design workshops.  I was listening to a podcast from the Emergence 07 conference, where Oliver King of Engine was holding an open discussion about the changing role of the designer, largely focusing on the concept of designer as facilitator.  Something that stood out for me was a participant’s opinion on design education;

“…facilitation is not taught in universities and not every designer is a good facilitator”

For me, design education needs to change to accomodate the changing role of the designer.  Texts like this clearly demonstrate the complex nature of this type of work, covering organisation, skills, mindset, generative tools and more that is needed to successfully conduct a workshop.  In context of the architects here, drawing people’s ideas in real time, there is a clear skill and process to doing this, covered in chapters like, ‘Anatomy of a Co-design drawing’.

Activity timeline (after Le Corbusier)

There is also a fantastic diagram and images from the 70s showing the co-design group using an Activity Time Line (after Le Cobusier) where the artists indicates the helix of a rising and setting sun and marks off the hours of the day and the night.  The participating audience then shout out tasks they would do during the time period, which is marked onto the diagram.  They then group off and choose an activity to work on with an artist, and start building ideas based around it.  Reminds me alot of journey mapping, just in a 24 hour community sense sort of way.

How to organise and facilitate a co-design workshop

Why do I think this book is so important?  It shows there is so much more to the co-design workshop than meets the eye, and whilst, we do only learn through practice, I think methods like this, which are so common in our current design practice should be taught in  a more in depth and pragmatic way, with a focus on the mindset ideally put on for this process.

Below are two excerpts from an initial think piece I’ve been working on about design education, the changing role of the designer and the challenges this poses to design students;

Texts like Co-design[1] are comprehensive in their descriptions of how to facilitate correctly in the context of workshops, and are incredibly detailed about the way a facilitator draws people’s ideas, how to deal with overpowering participants and how to correctly note take, to name but a few considerations.  These details are important and without proper training in this domain, results of a workshop can be tainted.

“The public needs a language that can give its creativity a focus and help individuals turn their intuition and knowledge into a workable idea.  That language must also be able to bridge the gap between the vision of the common resident and the technical thinking and jargon of the architects”[2]

This role of facilitation is about relinquishing control, and the tools of designer, namely their ability to give ideas form through drawing or model making must be carefully considered.  Designers can be incredibly influential in what they choose to make tangible, by making something real, it can sway the whole group’s opinion one way without considering other possibilities.  Therefore the designer must act impartial, and drive the group through the creative process rather than own it.


[1] King S, Conley M, Latimer B and Ferrari D, Co-design: A process of design to participation
[2] McDowell LN cited from King S, Conley M, Latimer B and Ferrari D, Co-design: A process of design to participation, p45

the above was in response to this;

Introduction

“The move towards co-design, where the designer takes on the role of facilitator as well as form-giver, gives even greater weight to the significance of how user research and engagement is taught on design courses. Practising co-designers do not simply see people as research subjects, but as active participants in the design process, whose time and contributions need to be recognised and honoured.  Conducting this kind of participative user research and inquiry on social issues presented students with a new set of challenges, both practical and ethical.” [1]

In the last twenty years the role of the designer has changed from solo author to co-creator.  In a move away from the modernist conception of designer as individual expert, design thinkers have adopted a participatory approach, involving users directly in the development of new products/services/systems throughout the design process.

This can largely be seen in the emergence of the Service Design discipline throughout the last decade,[2] which has been highlighted and catapulted into the hands of students, business and governments worldwide by the internet’s coverage and sharing of methodologies[3].

Service design leans heavily on the principles and methods of participatory design, a practice with roots in the Scandinavian workplace and trade unions.  The discipline is predominately co-creative, user-centric and adopts a holistic approach to design, including insights from, and direct engagement throughout the design process with a range of stakeholders and user groups in the development of new service offerings.

“…there are professions more harmful than industrial design – but only a few” [4]

“The time has come to review Papanek… from a new perspective, which reduces the distance between market-based and socially oriented initiatives”. [5]

Victor Papanek in 1971, suggested that designers take stock of what they’re doing, suggesting that designers who engaged with the market should spend one tenth of their time or money towards socially responsible projects.  Nicola Morelli argued in 2007 that Papanek provides a ‘triple bottom line’ for considering new design proposals, merging towards a basic definition of sustainability and a new model for the design process that considers environmental, social and economic impact. (figure 1)

In recent developments, encouraged perhaps by some of these older texts asking us to take responsibility for what we design[6] and a recognition by the public sector and government in design thinking[7], several of the world’s leading design and service design consultancies have began to tackle complex social issues[8], moving away from the business and management foundations the discipline was built on. This area of work has been spearheaded by initiatives such as Dott 07[9] and Public services by design[10].  Publications like, Wouldn’t it be great if?[11], highlight design as being able to,

“…help us in the public services to be more innovative. We need to be conscious that today’s problems are just not going to be addressed by yesterday’s ideas and yesterday’s solutions” [12]

It seems a natural progression for the design community and in particular the service design discipline to move into this territory due to its user-centred nature and holistic approach to problem solving.  In recent years, new branches of design thinking have stretched the field further, like transformation[13] and social design with supporting initiatives like red appearing[14].  This all comes at a particularly convenient time with a rising focus in the hyperlocal and community driven delivery of services by government and an emphasis on ‘citizen and community engagement.’[15]

“If thirty years in politics – as a local councillor, MP and cabinet minister – have taught me one thing, it is that government and public services depend on a partnership with citizens to make things work.”[16]

In light of this emerging domain and a steady influx of socially motivated projects being introduced into design courses at undergraduate level, [17] design educators must reflect on the changing role of the designer and the new landscapes they are operating in, developing new frameworks to accommodate the need for new mindsets and skills.

This initial think piece will reference throughout a recent project undertaken by the students of a new postgraduate Masters course, Design Innovation at the Glasgow School of Art. It will highlight issues that will need to be taken into consideration surrounding this type of participatory work, in particular the effect of designers engagement with people and a consideration of a new design philosophy that focuses on promoting a sustainable approach to community and participatory design work.


[1] The RSA Website, Six challenges for design education http://www.thersa.org/about-us/media/press-releases/six-challenges-for-design-education [04/01/10]
[2] The discipline has emerged in response to a global shift towards a service based economy
Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F., Service-Dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1-10
[3] Service Design Tools, Homepage, http://servicedesigntools.org [04/01/10]
[4] Papanek V, Design for the real world, p14 cited from Thackara J, In the bubble: Designing in a complex world, p7
[5] Sustain our Nation Site, Approaches and exemplars, http://www.sustainournation.org/toolkit-resources/approaches-and-exemplars/ [04/01/10] citing Nicola Morelli (2007)
[6] “The context of industrial mechanisation has changed, but 100 years later and in our times, the sociologist Richard Sennett presses for debate about the consequences of what we make” Parker S, Social Animals: tomorrow’s designers in today’s world, p 21 citing R Sennet, The Craftsman
[7] Partners can be noted in the publication by the Design Council, Public Services by design, A new route to public sector innovation, p15
[8] Burns C, Cottam H, Vanstone C, Winhall J, RED Paper 02: Transformation Design
[9] Dott 07 (Designs of the time 2007), a year of community projects, events and exhibitions based in North East England, explored what life in a sustainable region could be like – and how design could help us get there.
Cited from Design of the times website, What was Dott07, http://www.dott07.com/go/what-is-dott [04/01/10]
[10]Public Services by Design is a new programme to inspire and enable design innovation in public services. It helps public sector managers build awareness and understanding of how design can help in the process of developing and delivering better public services.
Cited from Design Council Website, Public Services by Design page, http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/Design-Council/1/What-we-do/Our-activities/Public-services-by-design/ [04/01/10]
[11] Design Council and Thackara J, Wouldn’t it be great if
[12] Birchard M (Sir), Public Services by Design, p5
[13] Burns C, Cottam H, Vanstone C, Winhall J, RED Paper 02: Transformation Design
[14] RED was set up in 2004 by the Design Council to tackle social and economic issues through design led innovation, RED website, homepage, http://www.designcouncil.info/RED/ [04/01/10]
[15] Blunkett D (MP), A People’s Police Force
[16] Blunkett D (MP), Touching the State
[17] The RSA Design Directions programme is a competition aimed at undergraduate and recent graduates from design courses around the UK cited from Campbell E, You know more than you think you do: design as resourcefulness & self reliance
Advertisements

6 Comments so far
Leave a comment

is this the essay you were working on (re. twitter msg)? it is good!!!

Comment by Qin

Thank you.

yes it is an excerpt of one of two. First is about the mindset of a designer and the second about the changing needs of design students, ethics of engagement/sustainable design in social projects and how the design community should respond… I hope to publish both soon, but have certain referenced ‘content’ which is unpublished as of yet so need to check if I can get a go ahead to put online.

I do worry the second essay was a bit ramble like..we will see how it goes down come end of Jan.

Hope yours went well!

Comment by sarahdrummond

Thanks for this interesting read and the reference Sarah. I’m writing up a case study for my PhD at the moment on the role of the designer as co-creator. I am using thinkpublic’s Alzheimer 100 project (http://www.alzheimer100.co.uk/project.php) to profile what a designer does in their role as co-creator.

My PhD is actually on the changing role of the designer and like yourself, I believe that it is a timely subject to address as reflection and awareness for practicing designers and other stakeholders of design, and also for design education.

In fact, in Nov last year I presented my research on seven roles of the designer at a design education conference in Singapore. The intent of the paper was to inform design education of these different roles so it may help their pathway in developing design education for tomorrow’s designer.

I had to write a paper to overview my research, so let me know if you’d like a copy of it. I blogged a bit about the conference with a visualisation of seven different roles of the designer I identified in Dott 07. You might find it of interest:

http://letterstoaustralia.blogspot.com/2009/12/icsid-education-conference-22-november.html

Comment by Lauren Tan

Hi Lauren, thanks for the comment.

Yes, I’ve seen your diagram from Dott07 before, I’ve got you on my RSS 😉
Would like to see the overview, if you could send me a copy. sarah@mypolice.org
That would be greatly appreciated.

The topic interests me greatly and something I’ve followed for several years, this changing role and the explosion of service design, seeing this domain as the role of pushing more and more into social design. For the above I was in need of a ‘subject’ to write a short paper on, I chose ethical considerations both for engagement of direct user engagement (in terms of dealing with vulnerable users, like Jo Harrington talks about in ‘They’re called hard to reach for a reason http://vimeo.com/7771878)

and then in the context of engaging communities in ‘social design’ work. For me, Ezio Manzini and Amartya Sen are strong in this field, discussing enabling capabilities and solutions. I think design students (who don’t have tend to have community work skills, and I have seen in several studies raise hopes of a community) I think there is more work to be done here and books like co-design show us that there are ways of teaching this facilitation role. Ezio’s work is here http://www.sustainable-everyday.net/manzini/ (you probably know), lots of the pieces tackle this notion. However after reading some of his publications/books/ and having asked him about sustainably motivation of communities and not really getting a concrete answer, I’m keen to stop ‘talking’ about the subject and start doing.

I guess you can see some of this new type of work in my Masters of Design course with the getgoglasgow project, and even though we are doing the best we can, may have fallen short in certain way and lacked ethical and sustainable guidelines to our work. You can find this here at http://sustainournation.ning.com

I’m passionate about co production and believe that this is something designer should take note of, and be read up on.

Hopefully I’ll get to publish my work, once It’s been ok’d. x

Comment by sarahdrummond

[…] Sarahfeed GSA HubWyndford gets £20000Getgo wins Audi competitionDesigning DublinCo-design isn’t really that new […]

Pingback by Building an engine « Inside the head of a designer

It’s great that you are picking up these longer perspectives. If you want to dive in even deeper I woudl recommend the book
Jungk, R. and Mullert, N. (1987) Future Workshops: How to create desirable futures.
At the other end pof the spectrum, vonHippel and other user-driven innovation writers have their take on these things.
And you may also find quite a lot of stuff from Scandinavia with similar goals (Participatory of Cooperative design), from authors such as Pelle Ehn, Susanne Bödker, Finn Kensing, Morten Kyng, Schuler/Namioka, and others.
I wrote a piece where I tried to understand these different ways of seeing participation/involvement in three layers; a strategic/emancipatory, a tactical/co-operative, and an operational/involvement:
“[participatory design and service design] base their argumentation on emancipatory objectives; be they democratic, power-driven or sustainability-laden. Both set up and organise co-operative approaches. And finally, both use engaged involvement and pluralistic participative techniques to operationalize these.”
(see http://www.aho.no/PageFiles/6819/New/Holmlid%20Participative,%20co-operative,%20emancipatory.pdf)

Keep up the good work!

/Stefan

Comment by Stefan Holmlid




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



%d bloggers like this: